Search This Blog

Thursday, July 25, 2019

In Full Bloom, Adam VillaSeñor - 2019

In Full Bloom

In Full Bloom 2019
R - 85 min   Adam VillaSeñor, Reza Ghassemi, Narrative Feature (85min)

Set after WWII, In Full Bloom follows two fighters, a down and out boxer from the US and the other, the Japanese champion. We follow each of their inner journeys as it culminates into a world championship fight against both men that will test the very limits of their spirit.

This is amazing. Best fight scenes I've ever witnessed since Raging Bull. That film was amazing of course because at the time it was made, the kind of fight scenes that Scorcese created had not really been invented, so there was the "first to market" effect, and this film most likely owes much to that. But the realistic nature of the fight in this film, combined with the depth and focus of the story inside the minds of these 2 men made this incredible. I felt it overly melodramatic at first, until I understood that the entire film was at least in keeping with that style, and it turned out to be a psychological drama and in a unique portrait style, like a great painting, that was being staged more than the American-ish styled event-driven, or goal-driven storytelling we are used to. It transcended my expectations and somewhere right around the time of the blindfold sequence, facing the fear in the forest, it became instead an engrossing reality. 

THIS IS A PSYCHOLOGICAL DRAMA AND WORK OF ART...not a traditional-based film that follows a narrative that forms a history and surroundings, side-scenes, like in Rocky where we have so much side-story that builds the drama. This sticks as close to the inner drama of the fighters as you can get, even incorporating highly stylized arthouse dream sequences in motif rather than personal historical moments like Rocky and his trainer "get up ya bum!"  There is none of that. It is very much like the plain difference between a character-driven film and the plot driven film. The plot had no place here, even though you can look for it in vain. There is history here, sure, but it's cut off and relegated to the personal realm, so these men become all men who struggle with the same fight, and not just a moment dragged out of a news drawer and given new life with revisitation.

I was bothered at first that the American's experience was almost totally shot in a red locker room, until I also realized that, yes, the story needed to be placed in the present-tense situation, but more-so this was in keeping with the character's mindset, his situation being the present-tense, his experience being a past so very different and distant. He was fighting an inner demon, a red one, claustrophobic, tightening around him, like the pressure on his chest. It was perfectly good storytelling. Incredible. Will watch again.

As I say this however, I am also hesitant and wondering if, like many outsider types of films, this one being Japanese, will make it in pop cinema here in the states.  I am now a fan. I get it. Congratulations on a powerful piece of art. PS: on further reflection...you know how sometimes a great visual drama piece falls apart in the story department, like something doesn't make sense, etc? This one did NOT do that. Everything makes perfect sense, as far as I can figure right after seeing it. There is a tie-in everywhere, right down to the last line "I just wanted peace". This ties back to the WWII fight scenes. Super well-written

Adam VillaSeñor, Reza Ghassemi, Narrative Feature (85min

Set after WWII, In Full Bloom follows two fighters, a down and out boxer from the US and the other, the Japanese champion. We follow each of their inner journeys as it culminates into a world championship fight against both men that will test the very limits of their spirit.

IMDB Link

- Agitatus

Saturday, July 20, 2019

Heartland International Film Festival SHORTS - MY Picks that made it in, and MORE.

Heartland Festival Shorts

My time as a Screener for the Heartland International Film Festival SHORTS was well-lived.  I screened over 240 films for the festival this year, and while that may seem like a great number of films, consider that the festival received over 3100 entries, just for the Short Film competition!  There are over 60 screeners worldwide that view the films for inclusion, and several advanced committees that co-review them for final judging after we're done with them.  We're now currently reviewing the many feature-film length entries, expected to again take awhile to get through.

LINK:

My top list included films from many genres and styles, BUT...of course not all of my picks were included in the final entries.  However...5 of them were.  I was told that out of that many films and screeners that to have more than 2 of my picks included in the lineup was a very good thing.  Meaning...I have good taste?  Well, tastes are not all that matter at a festival.

Film festival screening and judging are very subjective kinds of things, to some degree, because "tastes" run in as many directions as there are people.  However, there are basic rules to aesthetics, mechanics, and overall good judgment that form a base of criteria that almost everyone must follow to have films included in a list of "must watch" films.  Each film is viewed by at LEAST 3 screeners, and at least 2 committee members to be included.  Each one must pass through at least 2 levels of judgment prior to being given the "boot", meaning "not this year" or "try again next year".  So it's not as subjective as it might seem, especially when the screeners, like myself, must first pass a fairly rigorous and daunting exam of our tastes and judgment by viewing a few example films and making assessments that are both numerical on a scale, and written.  Each film screened by me had to be viewed for at least 5 minutes prior to moving on to another film, given a scale of 1-5, 1 being "weak", and 5 being "amazing", and also a Thumbs-Up or Down, meaning "I think this film should be included in this festival".   And consideration for the guidelines must be in play there as well.  THEN...we need to write a short reasoning why we came up with our judgment.

The basic bottom line summary of what we look for is summed up in the following statement:
Heartland looks for a solid blend of message/story and artistic/technical quality, and ultimately asks you to consider this question: does the given film combine a strong story or unique vision with technical skill? 

So, the guidelines are fairly basic and easy to assess if you ask it only that way, and honestly, the way that I completed my task for these films was to create my judgment almost right away when the film was finished, fill in the boxes, give it a number, and write a few sentences.

Well, if you follow me as my blog reader, you know that "a few sentences" are not that easy for me, and so it proved true for the festival entries.  On about 20% or more of the entries I wrote about, I spent a few paragraphs about them, especially if they were on the extreme ends of the spectrum, either 4s and 5s, or a 1.  What I ended up doing so that others may not need to spend a great deal of time reading through all of my comments was summarizing first with a few comments, and then posting the rest of my assessment in another paragraph that started with, "Other Comments, if you care to read them..."

So here is MY personal pick list, and if you're among them and you didn't make it in, sorry, but you did get my support.  I'll list the 1st 5 that DID get included in the festival first, by title, style, selected category, Director/Writer, and country of origin, run time:

Guaxuma - Animated - Finalist for Grand Prize - Nara Normande - France/Brazil - 14 min.
Judas Collar - Narrative - Official Selection "Beyond the Healines" - Alison James - Australia - 15 min.
Pinchpot - Animated - Official Selection "For the whole family" - Greg Holfeld - Australia - 5 min.
Reality Baby - Documentary - Wild Card Official Selection - Nodlag Houlihan - Ireland - 13 min.
Patision Avenue - Narrative - Wild Card Official Selection - Thanasis Neofotistos - Greece - 13 min.

Congratulations to those 5!


- Agitatus